User talk:Gary

Good article reassessment for High-level radioactive waste management

High-level radioactive waste management has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Optical properties of carbon nanotubes

Optical properties of carbon nanotubes has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Citizens' assemblies of the Roman Republic

Citizens' assemblies of the Roman Republic has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ifly6 (talk) 09:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Architecture of Leeds

Architecture of Leeds has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Harvey Littleton

Harvey Littleton has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of IAmaze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IAmaze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IAmaze (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AndesExplorer (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)